the ECHR validates the ban on ritual slaughter without stunning in Belgium

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) gives the green light. The Flemish and Walloon regions in Belgium are justified in prohibiting the ritual slaughter of animals without prior stunning for the Jewish and Muslim religions, this supranational court ruled on Tuesday, February 13, considering that there was no reason to do so. kind of violation of freedom of religion. The Court was seized by Belgian nationals, Muslims and Jews, as well as associations representing national and provincial authorities of Muslim communities.

READ ALSO : Ritual slaughter and labeling: no obligation of transparency, rules the Council of State

They were protesting against decrees adopted in 2017 and 2018 by the Flemish and Walloon regions putting an end to the authorization of the ritual slaughter of animals without stunning. The Brussels-Capital region is not concerned and currently remains the only one in Belgium to authorize this practice.

No religious discrimination, according to the Court

The ECHR, which ruled for the first time on this question, first recalls that “ the contested decrees were adopted following extensive consultation of representatives of different religious groups, veterinarians and animal protection associations “. She then highlights the “ considerable effort » deployed by the authorities « in order to best reconcile the objectives of promoting animal welfare and respect for freedom of religion “.

READ ALSO : Animal welfare: Ban on bullfighting or slaughter without stunning, these taboo abolitions

Regional legislators sought to weigh the rights and interests involved at the end of a duly considered legislative process », continues the ECHR, the judicial arm of the Council of Europe. It concludes that by adopting the contested decrees prohibiting the slaughter of animals without prior stunning in the Flemish and Walloon regions, the authorities “ have taken a measure which is justified in principle and which can be considered proportionate to the aim pursued, namely the protection of animal welfare as an element of “public morality” “. The Court therefore judges that “ there was therefore no violation of Article 9 of the Convention » European human rights protection, which protects freedom of religion. The ECHR also considers that the applicants were not victims of discrimination.

READ ALSO : Untimely column: animal suffering, long live secular Europe!

Patrice Spinosi, lawyer for the Jewish applicants in this case, indicated that he was studying the possibility of appealing the case to the Grand Chamber of the ECHR. “ We will be keen to assess the chances of success of a referral of this case to the Grand Chamber, so that this formation, which is the most solemn of the European Court, has the opportunity to rule on a question as important as it is unprecedented. “, did he declare.

Source link

Similar Articles



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


Most Popular