And she confirms Tel Aviv The clock will not turn back, indicating that Tehran will not escape punishment, according to the expression of Israeli officials.
On the other hand, Iranian officials confirm that their country is ready to confront all scenarios and that the “response” to the “response” will be painful for Tel Aviv, according to Iranian vocabulary.
On Thursday, the British newspaper “The Times” revealed, quoting an informed intelligence source, that “Israel has postponed its retaliatory response to Iran due to the need to change some strategies.”
The British newspaper reported that “Israel was forced to develop an alternative plan to attack Iran“, adding, “The Israeli alternative plan to attack Iran requires… Maneuvers Detailed combat before issuing any order.
The decision to postpone the retaliatory strike came after the leak, which occurred last week, of secret military information, which was an American assessment of the possible Israeli response.
The newspaper reported: “She is afraid Israel The leak could help Iran predict certain patterns of attack. “It was forced to devise an alternative plan, requiring detailed war maneuvers to be carried out before any order could be issued.”
In this regard, Sky News Arabia’s special analyst, Muwafaq Harb, said that there are multiple theories regarding the American leaks regarding the Israeli attack, adding:
- There are those who say that the leaks were intentional in order for what happened to happen, that is, to postpone the Israeli strike.
- Leaking is part of political action in US.
- The purpose of the leak may be to sabotage the operation or buy some time.
- Ultimately, this is a theory and cannot be confirmed.
- Any military planner, when some aspects of his preparations are revealed, must resort to modification.
- The leaked information did not talk about goals, but focused on the content.
For his part, researcher at the Emirates Policy Center, Dr. Muhammad Al-Zaghoul, told the “Newsroom” on Sky News Arabia:
- Israel defines Iran as an existential enemy, and its ultimate goal is to overthrow Iranian regime.
- in contrast, American administration It refuses to define the Iranian regime as an existential threat, and here is the origin of the dispute between Tel Aviv and Washington.
- Any attempt to overthrow the Iranian regime will not serve the interests of the larger conflict that revolves around competition with China and the Eastern camp.
- America believes that Iran can be dealt with.
- We are not under the illusion that Washington disagrees with Netanyahu on the basis of whether he strikes Iran or not.
From Tehran, the Director of Studies for West Asian and North African Affairs at the Iranian Foreign Ministry, Ambassador Mojtaba Ferdowsi Pour, explained to “Sky News Arabia”:
- There are differences between The white house And the Netanyahu government regarding the response to Iran.
- The American leak cannot hasten or delay the Israeli response.
- Iran has capabilities and preparations for this attack.
- In Operation True Promise 2, Tehran demonstrated that it has high-level and formidable capabilities vis-à-vis Israel.
- Washington Today she is very weak, and has no real will.
